COMPUTER MEDIATED COMMUNICATION
TO EXPLAIN OR PREDICT MEDIA EFFECTS
The overview below is commonly used to explain or predict media effects. This overview is by no means complete, but provides a global summary of thinking about media and its effects.
See: Social Presence Theory, Reduced Social Cues Approach, Social Identity model of Deindividuation Effects.
Core Assumptions and Statements
Computer-Mediated Communication has become a part of everyday life. Research has suggested that CMC is not neutral: it can cause many changes in the way people communicate with one another, and it can influence communication patterns and social networks (e.g., Fulk & Collins-Jarvis, 2001). In other words, CMC leads to social effects. Rice & Gattiker (2001) state that CMC differs from face-to-face communication. CMC limits the level of synchronicity of interaction, which may cause a reduction of interactivity. Furthermore, CMC can overcome time- and space dependencies. Together with these arguments the overall use of using CMC results in multiple differences with face-to-face communication.
Conceptions of Social Cues and Social Effects in Different Theoretical Frameworks and their Purpose in Interactions.
Theory
|
Cues
|
Intended Effects
|
Social Presence
|
Non-verbal communication
Proximity and orientation
Physical appearance
|
Person perception
Intimacy/ immediacy
Interpersonal relations
|
Reduced Social Cues Approach
|
Non-verbal communication
Visual contact
Statues cues
Position cues
|
Normative behavior
Social influence
Person awareness
|
Social Identity Model of Deindividuation Effects (SIDE)
|
Individuating cues
Social categorizing cues
|
Social influence
|
Comments
Post a Comment